Social Darwinism

I reject social darwinism as a modus operandi, how to move on from social darwinism?

YAML 问题

Social darwinism is the idea that humans in social societies follow the same basic laws of darwinism where weaker species die out.

I would argue that modern society is far from what nature intended and is rather corrupted by wealthy interests.


没有子分类。




投票 (可选) (别通知) (可选)
请,登录

达尔文主义的替代品是马格利斯(L.Margulis)关于共生与合作作为发展动力的工作。

如果以达尔文主义为理念的教科书和文化是错误的,而只是一些思想团体的提倡,那该怎么办?

出于好奇,我建议观看有关Margulis创意的电影可能会激发其他创意:)

Alternative to Darwinism is L.Margulis work on Symbiosis and Cooperation as a driving force of evolution.

What if textbooks and culture that promote Darwinism as idea are wrong and is simply promoted by some thought collectives?

For curiosity, I recommend watching a movie on L.Margulis ideas which may spark alternative ideas :)



    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Ruta,

使我感到恶心的社会达尔文主义的另一个例子是,在COVID之后,我们的工作现在可以用外劳代替,因为如果您可以在家工作,则意味着可以远程工作。

Another example of social darwinism that makes me sick is the idea that our jobs are now replaceable with foreign labour after COVID because if you can work from home that means someone can work remotely.


社会达尔文主义(或者我称之为现代丛林),我的结论是,未来是一个自我编码的社会:

“如果我们作为一个人类有意识地定义我们的目标并追求它们,那么那将不再是市场经济。那将是计划经济,通过精心设计的灵活,开放和合理的资本流动管理系统,以贡献为基础风险的开放式风险管理系统,基于变量层次结构的级别,基于我们定义它们的需求。”

但我要指出的一个问题是我们的精神限制(心理健康)。因此,我得出结论,使大多数人了解社会整体运作方式的一种方法是,使人们了解社会如何使一切变得可公开获得和有据可查(类似于在IDE中可以帮助您深入到任何子过程)。

我指出的另一个问题是算法和过程是专有的且不透明的,而我担心将其打开可能会使机器自我复制。我指出监视系统是一种可能的预防措施。我可以补充一点,以真实的人类身份对操作进行加密签名也将有助于防止机器被接管,因此请记住,是的,我认为“自我编码协会” 是可行的替代方案。 “社会达尔文主义”

我将尝试将其描述为一个想法并对其进行详细阐述,因为可能会提出更多细节。

Social darwinism (or, as I called it Modern Jungle), and my conclusions were that the future is a society that codes itself:

"If we, as a mankind consciously define our goals, and pursue them, then that would not be market economy anymore. That would be planed economy, with carefully designed flexible, open and reasonable capital flow management system, informed by contribution-based and open risk management system, upon levels of hierarchies of variables, based on our needs that define them."

But a problem that I point out, is our mental limitations (mental health). So, I conclude that one way to enable the majority of people understand how society works as a whole, is to make the knowledge about how it makes everything, publicly accessible, and well-documented (a bit like in an IDE that helps you to drill down to any sub-procedure).

Another problem I pointed out, is algorithms and procedures being proprietary and non-transparent, and my worries that making them open may well may enable machines to self-replicate. I pointed out the monitoring systems as a possible precautionary measure. I could add, that cryptographic signing of operations with real human identities would also help to keep machines from taking over, so with that in mind, yeah, I think the "self-coding society" is a viable alternative to the "social darwinism".

I'll try to describe it as an idea and elaborate on it, as it may be possible to come up with more specifics.


一个例子是争夺食物阿拉饥饿游戏。这样对吗?我觉得很恶心。

An example is competing for food ala hunger games. Is it right? I find it disgusting.


由于我的精神分裂症,我无法与其他人竞争同等水平。这意味着我被困在很多地方。 (与医生,医院保持亲密接触)如果我在1950年代被残障,我的生活将与今天大不相同。现代医疗保健更具道德性。

我想竞争并构建Linux桌面环境,但是我没有技能。我因生病而努力学习新事物。

I cannot compete to the same degree as others due to my illness, schizophrenia. This means I am stuck where I am in a lot of areas. (Closeness to doctors, hospitals) Had I been disabled in 1950s my life would be very different to today. Modern healthcare is far more ethical.

I want to compete and build a Linux desktop environment but I don't have the skills to do so. I struggle with learning new things due to my illness.


语言