上级分类: 环境政治、法律与政府

Polycrisis in the Anthropocene

How does one solve the polycrisis in the Anthropocene in a timely manner?

YAML 问题

Complimentary, multi-scale solutions are simultaneously required. In particular, the fragmentation of approaches due to democratic / capitalistic processes, while creating diversity also creates friction, silos and wasted resources. Some means of unifying humanity is required to mobilize citizens to play an active role. This must occur at a sufficiently deep level to avoid the polarization prevalent in the world today. The sleeping giant of the world’s citizens has to be mobilized and if this can be done, will constitute a third p, middle-way force between the false dichotomy of top-down centralized power and bottom- up individual power, neither of which, alone or even together is effective in implementing the rapid change now required.


没有子分类。




投票 (可选) (别通知) (可选)
请,登录

[Gien] 欢迎欢迎!

// 需要团结人类,动员公民发挥积极作用

是的,地球上的积极公民!那么我们如何才能分享一种团结感呢?对我来说,这是关于共同的价值观,作为人类的共同叙事。这些普世价值是什么?比如爱情、友谊……然后是需要,比如联系、自我表达等。 [SBKauffman 最近研究了 A.Maslow 的作品,并在所有需要之上添加了“超越”](https://www. goodreads.com/en/book/show/49625550-transcend)。

但我们如何超越人类的统一并探索所有生物物种的统一感(从人类作为所有生命的中心转移到生命之网作为隐喻)?在这里,人类如何作为“关键物种”照顾和保护其他物种,并以这样的视角设计一个人造世界?

[Gien] welcome welcome!

// unifying humanity is required to mobilize citizens to play an active role

yes, active citizenship on the planet Earth! so how might we share a sense of togetherness? to me, this is about shared values, shared narratives as humans. what would be those universal values? like love, friendship, ... then it comes needs, like connection, seld-expression, etc. S.B.Kauffman recently looked into A.Maslow's work and added "transcendence" on top of all needs.

but also how might we go beyond unification of humans and explore a sense of unification of all living species (moving away from humans at the center of all life and into a web of life as a metaphor)? here, how could humans serve as "keystone species" and care and protect other species, and design a human made-up world with such a perspective?


欢迎 [Gien] 来到“无限”。恭喜您获得第一个兴趣和问题!当您环顾四周时,请先看看页脚中的链接,包括帮助部分。它解释了这个地方是如何运作的。

如果我理解正确,您的问题相当于问题: “我们如何才能快速解决人类发展造成的所有全球关注的近期地质问题?”

这是一个非常广泛的问题,暗示着诸如气候变化、地质问题之类的事情。

但是,在内容部分,您主要包括人类政治和自组织问题。

尽管大多数此类问题可以追溯到人类的自我组织和政治,但值得注意的是,人类只是一种哺乳动物,有点像蜜獾,他们在自己的兴趣范围内不断地寻找自己想要实现的目标的解决方案,使其难以控制。兴趣的范围必须以一种非常有意义的方式相交才能发生,因为不同的人对同一事物的不同方面感到兴奋,并且使用不同的词。

例如,虽然问题的地质表述可能会引起对你的情绪反应,但它是信息论表述(例如,我如何描述一个类似的全球问题这里),这似乎唤起了我的情绪反应。其他人还会有其他词汇来引起情绪反应,例如经济词汇等。作为痴迷于那一面的“蜜獾”,他们会从那个角度看世界,并且很可能会从事一些活动,从他们认为重要的角度推动积极的未来。结果会是什么——任何人都在猜测,是的,就像一群“蜜獾”一样,在涉及全球问题时,人类并没有那么协调。

互联网的发明也许是使他们协调一致的最大贡献,我们仍在研究如何利用互联网的力量来实现这种自我协调和动员。

Welcome [Gien] to the 'Infinity'. Congratulations with your first interest and question! While you're looking around, take a sneak at the links in the footer, including help section. It explain how this place works.

If I understand you correctly, your question is equivalent to question: "How can we quickly solve all the geologically recent problems of global concern, that human development has created?"

That's a very broad question, implying things like climate change, things of geological concern.

However, in the content section, you mostly include the human political and self-organizational issue.

Even though most such problems could be traced back to the human self-organization and politics, it is worth noting that humans are just a type of mammal, that are a bit like honey-badgers, that individually persistently look for solutions to goals they want to achieve within the scopes of their interests, making it hard to control them. The scopes of interests must intersect in a very meaningful way this to happen, as different personalities are excited about different aspects of the same things, and using different words.

For example, while the geological formulation of the problem perhaps may evoke emotional response to you, it is information-theoretic formulation (for example, how I described a similarly global issue here), that seem to evoke emotional response to me. Other people yet, will have other vocabularies that evoke emotional response, for example, economic vocabulary, and so on. As the "honey-badgers" obsessed with that side, they will view the world from that perspective, and are likely to engage in some activities to push towards the positive futures from the perspectives they feel important. What will be the outcome -- is anyone's guess, and yes, just like a bunch of "honey-badgers", humans are not that well coordinated, when it comes to the global issues.

The invention of the Internet perhaps was the single greatest contribution to make them coordinated, and we're still figuring out how to use the power of the Internet to achieve such self-coordination and mobilization.



    : transiency
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,
[+]

语言