问题: The Scandal of Money

The Time Shop

+2  

Exchange products based on the amount of time it takes to produce them

YAML 想法



(别通知) (可选) 请,登录

呵呵,从我们以“人类工时”衡量[(/ rate /)价值的意义上讲,确实是,将“花费的时间”作为我们社区的KPI(here )。但是,交易不是在“米”之间发生,而是在实际对象和“绳”之间发生,从这个意义上说,“米”是中性的,因此我们不会在“度量单位”中进行0oo的交换。我们以实际货币来表示,但是我们以所有货币的“ h”(米)来表示和显示。因此,我想,您可以说“是与否”。

Heh, well, it does, in the sense that we measure value in "human hours", targeting for "time-well spent" as our community's KPI (here). However, trade happens not between "meters", but between actual objects and "ropes", in that sense, the "meter" is a bit of a neutral thing, so we don't do exchange on 0oo in "unit of measure" we do it in real currencies, but we express and display it in "h" (the meter" of all currencies. So, I'd say, you could say both "yes and no".



    : Ruta
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,

它也与0oo有关吗? [敏迪]

Does it relate to 0oo too? [Mindey]


呵呵,这与消费者价格细分要求的想法有关。拥有一台可以生产数百万质量相同的物品的机器的人去同一个市场与手工制品竞争,而人们在不了解人工估算的情况下购买它们,这可能是不公平的。如果将这种人工估算值包含在标签中,例如成分(通常在法律上要求包含成分),那么人们将开始意识到并调整某些社会不平等现象,例如产品定价。

Heh, that is so related to the idea of consumer price breakdown requirement. It may be unfair that someone with a machine who can produce millions of items of same quality goes to the same market to compete with handmade items, and people buying them without knowing the human-time estimate. If this human-time estimate were to be included into labels, like an ingredient (ingredients are often legally required to be included), then people would start realizing and adjusting certain social inequalities, like product pricing.



    : transiency
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,

语言