Exchange products based on the amount of time it takes to produce them
呵呵，从我们以“人类工时”衡量[（/ rate /）价值的意义上讲，确实是，将“花费的时间”作为我们社区的KPI（here ）。但是，交易不是在“米”之间发生，而是在实际对象和“绳”之间发生，从这个意义上说，“米”是中性的，因此我们不会在“度量单位”中进行0oo的交换。我们以实际货币来表示，但是我们以所有货币的“ h”（米）来表示和显示。因此，我想，您可以说“是与否”。
Heh, well, it does, in the sense that we measure value in "human hours", targeting for "time-well spent" as our community's KPI (here). However, trade happens not between "meters", but between actual objects and "ropes", in that sense, the "meter" is a bit of a neutral thing, so we don't do exchange on 0oo in "unit of measure" we do it in real currencies, but we express and display it in "h" (the meter" of all currencies. So, I'd say, you could say both "yes and no".
Does it relate to 0oo too? [Mindey]
Heh, that is so related to the idea of consumer price breakdown requirement. It may be unfair that someone with a machine who can produce millions of items of same quality goes to the same market to compete with handmade items, and people buying them without knowing the human-time estimate. If this human-time estimate were to be included into labels, like an ingredient (ingredients are often legally required to be included), then people would start realizing and adjusting certain social inequalities, like product pricing.