Work interface


As a user of someone's work I don't need to care how it is implemented I just want some thing satisfied. Similar how computer programming interfaces work, I want to depend on someone else's implementation or work that they do and use it


Give people complete freedom how to decide how to solve some work purpose from time organisation to planning techniques.

Enforce a boundary of work completed and this boundary should not impose any rules or requirements how the work is to be done.

So if it was a sandwich shop, then the staff can decide how to organise their work per order. But they have the requirement to pass the information to the cashier or the cashier asks what they ordered.

(别通知) (可选) 请,登录

有一个版本的 Infinity 有“问题”奖,即每个问题都像一个基金一样运作,人们在其中放置激励措施。但是,从技术上讲,每一个基金都是一个“公司”,所以,从本体上讲,它属于一个“项目”的特征。为了以适当的本体论方式实现这样的功能,将许多公司(即“项目”)链接到一个问题(就像有许多非营利组织致力于解决一个问题一样)。这些“项目”(组织)然后可以作为解决问题的资金。但是,我们已经允许将多个项目链接到一个问题(概念/谜题)。这意味着,可以通过在项目中添加“is fund”类型,并在问题级别(概念/谜题)中添加适当的逻辑来实现资金问题的这一特征,从而允许用户通过项目将资金分配给问题那是他们的资金。

There was a version of Infinity with prizes for "Problems", i.e., each problem working like a fund, where people put incentives. However, technically, each fund is a "company", so, ontologically, it belongs to be a feature of a "project". To realize such feature in proper ontological fashion, would be linking many companies (i.e.., "Projects") to a single problem (just like there are many non-profit organizations working towards a single problem). These "Projects" (orgs) then can work as funds for the problem. However, we already allow to link multiple projects to a single problem (concept/puzzle). This implies, that this feature of funding problems could be realized by adding a type "is fund" to projects, and adding appropriate logic in the level of problems (concepts/puzzle), that allows users to allocate funds to the problem via the projects that are funds for them.


It occurred to me that I could informally propose a stake or a bounty as a comment. Would you be opposed to this Mindey?


It occurred to me that if I could place a bounty in an infinity puzzle or idea that would encourage people to start projects based on them.

    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    :  -- 


除了需要某种形式的信息系统来收集所需的结果之外,这实际上是一样的。 Infinity family 已经是那种系统,好像没有定义应该如何完成工作。

我还希望其他人实现我在无限家庭上创建的东西。我不会强加他们应该如何解决问题,只是他们产生问题。因此,我希望可扩展计算变得容易,并且可以分散计算和数据存储,这可能由 CRDT 支持。

It's practically the same thing except there needs to be some form of information system to collect desired results. Infinity family is kind of that system already as if doesn't define how work should be done.

I also want other people to implement things I've created on infinity family. I don't impose how they should solve the problem only that they produce it. So I want scalable computing to be easy and spread out computation and data storage maybe backed by a CRDT.

    :  -- 
    : Mindey
    :  -- 


已经完成,macromanagers 已经实践过。

// 这个想法是,只要满足推理,人们就会被赋予大量令人讨厌的自由变量来定义以及它们如何工作


Already done, already practiced by macromanagers.

// This idea is that people are given an obnoxious number of free variables to define and how they work as long as if satisfies an inferface

How would this "megamanagement" be different from what Wikipedia describes as "macromanagement"?


This idea is that people are given an obnoxious number of free variables to define and how they work as long as if satisfies an inferface