问题: 艺术Definition of Life

Living Matryoshkas

0  

Balancing Lower-Level System for Cascading Effects in Higher Levels

YAML 想法

The hypothesis is, if a lower level living system is un-well, the higher level living system is un-well too. Specifically, if a bacteria is un-well, human body is un-well too, and such earth is un-well too.

1 Living Systems Principles

If Human, Bacteria, Earth all are living systems, they share Living Systems principles:

  • Autopoiesis - self-making, self-maintaining, self-regeneration

  • Synergy - the whole is bigger than its parts

  • Fractals

... (which other Living Systems principles we should explore for this experiment?)

2 Balancing Lower-Level System for Cascading Effects in Higher Levels

If #1 is true, then we try to balance a lower-level system (which is a bacteria), so that we see if a higher-level system improves (which is a human, and then the earth).



(别通知) (可选) 请,登录

//平衡低级系统以实现更高级别的级联效果//

您是说-“自下而上”的世界观-“要在较高级别的组织中实现幸福,首先要平衡较低级别的组织?”我想这个想法已经成为儒家哲学的一部分:即从你自己开始,然后是“家庭,学校,当地社区,国家和王国”。

我看到您正在尝试将这种“自下而上”的世界观与“生活系统原则”结合起来,假设它们普遍使生活系统在组织的任意层次上“幸福”或和谐。那么,您留下的带有“ ...”标记的“生活系统”的其余原理是什么,因为它似乎是该思想的细节和新颖性的核心(如“自下而上”原理本身就是众所周知的)。

最后,假设细菌是人们关心的组织水平,那么人们将如何应用“自生”,“协同”和“分形”原理使这一水平“良好”(这将导致细菌水平的提高)。以上水平)?

可以将此思想概括为:“接受生命系统的原理,并将其应用到生活的基本层面,并通过归纳,使宏观和高阶生活条件得到改善?” 顺便说一句,何时考虑细菌之类的事物的福祉,不要将它们视为某种仁慈的媒介,它们会因人格而异,还有诸如坏死性筋膜炎(“食人鱼细菌”)之类的物种,它们不会靠近我们的系统,例如蚊子。我们可能认为我们想对所有事物都有利,但必须在正确的时间,正确的时间将事物放置在正确的位置,以使系统实现和谐。

// Balancing Lower-Level System for Cascading Effects in Higher Levels //

Do you mean -- "Bottom-Up" world view -- "To achieve well-being in the higher levels of organization, first balance the lower level of organization?" I guess this idea has been part of Confucian philosophy: i.e., start from yourself, then "the family, the school, the local community, the state, and the kingdom".

I see that you are trying to combining this "bottom-up" world view with the "Living Systems Principles", assuming that they universally make living systems "happy" or harmonious at arbitrary level of organization. So, what are the rest of the principles of "Living Systems" that you had left with the "..." mark, as it seems to be the core of specifics and novelty of this idea (as the "bottom-up" as principle itself is well-known).

Finally, assuming that bacteria are the level of organization that one cares about, how would one apply the principles of "Autopoiesis" and "Synergy" and "Fractals" to make that level be "well" (that would result in the improvement in the levels above)?

Could this idea be summarized as -- "Take the principles of Living Systems, and apply them at the base level of life, and by induction, get the condition of macroscopic and higher order life improve?" Btw., when thinking of well-being of things like bacteria, don't think of them as some kind of benevolent agents, they are varied as personalities, there are species like the necrotizing fasciitis ("piranha bacteria"), that one would not to get near our systems, or, for example mosquitos. We may think we want to be good for everything, but things have to be in the right places at the right times for systems to achieve harmony.



    : Ruta
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,

语言